
Luck or skill?
To win an open pairs tournament is luck or skill more important?
Generally at the start of any open tournament there are only a handful of pairs that realistically are expected to have a chance to win the tournament. These favourites are recognisable as they normally contain two grandmasters. Within this group their favouritism will be ranked in proportion to their total rating points. But what actually determines which of these favoured pairs will eventually prevail? Luck or superior skill?
Taking the recent Palmerston North Christmas 3A pairs as an atypical example because the open tournament had a field with a wide skill/experience level. This tournament was won by Grandmasters Pamela Livingstone and Alastair Stuck (75.33% and 57.8% ) from Grandmasters Robin & Don Nightingale (58.85% and 67.2%). Fine results for both, with a comfortable win for Pamela and Alastair in the end by 7.08 %. Of the 64 pairs taking part by my count there were about a dozen Grandmasters pairs in the field that were favoured to win before the tournament started.
A couple of boards illustrate though how different their results may have been:
Morning session Board 13 All Vulnerable Dealer N:
9653
Q83
AQJ3
76
4
AKQJT
AK75
92
752
K96
KT532
AQ4
872
JT64
T84
J98
Pam and Alastair played in 3NT with East declarer making 7 after a lead for a 89% board (3.7 %) while Robin and Don also played in 3NT with East declarer making 6 after a
lead for a 34 % board (1.33%). If either had bid and made 6NT they would have got a 95% board (3.95%). Only with assistance from the defense can 7 be made.
Afternoon session Board 4 All Vulnerable Dealer W:
-
AQT
AT974
KQJ95
8732
J96
J97
6543
-
K632
A86432
T7
AKQT54
K82
QJ85
-
Pamela and Alastair took 6 by North light by 2 after a T
lead for a 100% board (4.17%) while Robin and Don took 6NT light by North 1 after a
lead for a 90% board (3.75%). If the opposition had made their 6
or 6NT contracts as they should have they would have had 24% & 8% boards respectively (1% & 0.33%). Although 6
is potentially tricky if East holds up their K
after the North ruffs the initial lead and leads the Q
with best line to cross to North’s hand to ruff a
before discarding North’s remaining
on 3 top
before drawing remaining trumps.
So back to my original question is it luck or skill that is more important to determine which of the favoured pairs will win an open pairs tournament? My theory is that for fields of diverse skill luck is the bigger factor once pairs have obtained the skills and experience to have reached grandmaster status. And if it is luck then we lesser pairs that have not reached grandmaster status also have a slim chance if we are really lucky on the day to strike the right pairs on the right hands.
Latest Posts on this Thread
- JOHN O'CONNOR22 Dec 2018 at 09:29PM
You have omitted a third factor which is also very important.
Form.
This is more important than luck. Think of it as how well do you play compared to how well you can play.
How well are you and your partner prepared for the event? Had enough sleep? Free of domestic and work distractions? No health issues? Correct nutrition before and during the event? Arrived in good time for the event? For me, these things can all make a difference between a 60%+ session and barely making 50%.
- Scott Smith19 Jan 2019 at 10:20PM
Skill. But as John says "skill" is not constant. Form, or "how skillfull am I today", is the key.
The alternative is that some players are consistently more lucky than others. Or to take your example, some grand masters are consistently more lucky many other grand masters. The just doesn't stand to reason.
Regards, Scott
Click here to log in.
