Security Improvements, Access Code & Mail Communication Preview

All News

Daily Bridge in New Zealand

For Junior, Intermediate and Novice players..and others. It’s FriYay.png day.

The Battle of the Minors.

Sometimes, not very often, the only suits which seem to matter are the minor suits. There are a couple of valuable lessons to learn from the following “bridge argument”.

Bridge in NZ.png nz map.jpg

North Deals
Both Vul

   

A 5 4

A 9 8

J

K Q 10 9 5 3

 

N

W

 

E

S

   

 

West

North

East

South

 

Pass

Pass

Pass

1 ♣

Pass

1 

Pass

2 ♣

Pass

2 

Pass

?

 

 

 

You have clubs and your partner has diamonds. 1Club-small promised at least 4 clubs. Which suit to we want to make the trump suit?

Let’s see what happened at the table. The news was not good for West.

North Deals
Both Vul

Q 10 3

Q 5 4

A 9 6 2

J 7 6

A 5 4

A 9 8

J

K Q 10 9 5 3

 

N

W

 

E

S

 

8 6 2

J 7 6

K Q 10 7 5 4

4

 

K J 9 7

K 10 3 2

8 3

A 8 2

 

West

North

East

South

 

Pass

Pass

Pass

1 ♣

Pass

1 

Pass

2 ♣

Pass

2 

Pass

3 ♣

All pass

 

 

West just did not like diamonds and so decided to make their suit trumps. East gave up bidding.

North led Spade-small3 (it would have been the same if North had led a small heart). West won the first trick with Spade-smallA and played Diamond-smallJ. North took their ace and played Spade-smallQ and then a spade to South’s Spade-smallJ.

South switched to a low heart, ducked to North’s Heart-smallQ. North continued hearts to South’s Heart-small10 and West’s Heart-smallA. The defence had taken 4 tricks and there were three more to come.

West tried Club-smallK to South’s ace. South cashed Heart-smallK and then played a 4th heart. North had to win another club trick for down 3, a terrible result for East-West especially as they were playing Pairs and it was a part-score deal, - 300.

West failed to appreciate what East’s 2Diamond-small bid meant. Typically, they were showing 6-9 hcp and at least 6 diamonds. Let’s see what would have happened if West had passed 2Diamond-small.

Again, it did not matter which major was led at trick 1. Let’s say Spade-small7. Say declarer ducked the first trick but won the spade continuation with Spade-smallA. Although it would be better for East to play clubs from their own hand, they needed to play clubs immediately to be able to discard one heart on Club-smallQ before the defence switched to hearts.

So, Club-smallK at trick 3. The defence played a third round of spades and then switched to hearts. East took Heart-smallA and discarded one little heart on Club-smallQ before playing Diamond-smallJ. Whether or not North took their ace immediately or not (ducking is theoretically better), the defence could only take 2 spade tricks, 1 heart trick and both minor suit aces…2Diamond-small making. Diamonds played two tricks better than clubs. Why should West have passed 2Diamond-small?

Are you listening, partner?

When both players have a long suit but one has few high card points, it is usually better to make the suit held by the weak hand (here East) as the trump suit. The above showed why. Playing in clubs, the East hand did not score one trick. The diamond suit was wasted.

Yet, playing with diamonds as trumps, declarer was able to score a valuable club trick to discard a heart. West had entries to the club suit with the major aces. East had no such outside entries.

It is not a good argument if West said that 2Club-small might have been a 5-card suit and that they had to tell their partner they held 6. The argument is unsound even if the initial 1Club-small could be less than 4 cards in length. It is 90% certain, probably even higher, that when West bid 2Club-small, they were showing at least 6 clubs….no major suit, no diamond support, no no-trump bid. East knew that when they bid 2Diamond-small. Therefore, East was promising at least 6 diamonds, no less. Unless West had no diamonds or maybe held 7 reasonable clubs, they should pass 2Diamond-small. At least they held Diamond-smallJ. It was possible East had no clubs at all.

Diamond-smallJ would have been so much more valuable in a diamond contract than Club-small4 was in a club contract. Yet, even if West's diamond was not an honour, they should still pass 2Diamond-small

One additional reason to pass 2Diamond-small was that East needed one trick less to make their contract than West did in 3Club-small. Note also, that West should not bid 2NT over 2Diamond-small. Misfitting hands with relatively few high card points play poorly in no-trumps. West should have passed 2Diamond-small not happily but in the knowledge that there was no better place to be. The reward would be a plus score.

West should have been grateful that South did not open the bidding as then they may well have bid up to 3Club-small in one or two bids and their best chance of a plus score would have gone.

enough said.jpg 

So, even if you were playing a short club opener, East had described their hand with 2Club-small. Let the “minor battle” end at the 2-level.

Richard Solomon

There is plenty of bridge this Friday evening. There is the Loveblock New Zealand Wide Pairs and also the final round of the Trans- Tasman Challenge, for kibitzers from around 8.30pm, a 16- board match through this link. 

http://www.aj92.com.au/results/results.asp?yr=2023&dir=anzc 

 

Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • TECT.jpg