Security Improvements, Access Code & Mail Communication Preview

All News

Daily Bridge in New Zealand

 

A "Grand" Hand.

I was curious why recently most of a relatively small field in a tournament failed to advance higher than game when it seemed the main problem would be reaching grand rather than small slam. The hand you will see below is rather good and the hand opposite it was significantly bad. It seems a touch of interference may have got in the way of advancing to a level higher than game.

So, what would your next action be with the following? Come on, we all know this is the kind of hand we long for every time we look at our 2 or 3 counts:

 

Bridge in NZ.png nz map.jpg

     

North Deals
None Vul

 

N

W

 

E

S

   
 

A K Q 8 6

A K 5

A K J 7 4

 

West

North

East

South

 

Pass

Pass

2 ♣

2 ♠

Pass

3 ♠

?

2Club-small is what you expect and partner had nothing to say over 2Spade-small, or are they lying in wait for a re-opening double? The latter seems less likely when East raises spades.

Let’s hear from our Panel, whose ranks are a little depleted at present by events in Marrakech.

Bruce Anderson “Double: What else? Obviously partner has little or nothing in high cards but if he/she has 5 trumps and passes, that must be good for our side. And over 4Diamond-small I will bid 4Heart-small, hoping partner has at least 3 of that suit.”

I agree about partner having 5 spades but if they really have nothing, can they really put together a hand this good when you bid 4Heart-small? “What else?” Well, this for starters as our next Panellist also sees no alternative to a different bid:

Stephen Blackstock “4Spade-small: Hoping that this shows a 2-suiter with Heart-small + minor, as (1Spade-small) 2Spade-small does. Nothing else appeals. 4Heart-small is not forcing. 4Club-small gets my suit lengths tangled, and while pass (yes I know it sounds silly) is not immediately damaging because it is forcing, but doesn't lead anywhere. I don't like double at all, even if it is take- out and not penalties (questionable).  What is North supposed to do with, say, Spade-smallxxx Heart-smallxx Diamond-smallxxxx Club-smallxxxx, or Spade-smallxxxx Heart-smallxxx Diamond-smallxxx Club-smallxxx? He will likely pass for lack of anywhere to go, and on a good day we get +100. We may not even beat 3Spade-small.”

Indeed, surely the strong hand has to be the “leader” here. If you can find a trump fit, then North really only needs 13 cards to make a small slam with our best fit as trumps. 

Agreeing is:

Nigel Kearney “4Spade-small: Hearts and a minor. Even without that agreement I expect partner will guess correctly that I have this hand type.and enough strength for at least the five level. Once we have found the best trump suit, I can bid on.”

Leon agrees with this bid although not quite the meaning, and as long as he does not want to teach the opponents a lesson. I think we really should assume here that the spade overcall and raise are sensible:

Leon Meier “4Spade-small: For me, it depends on who my opposition are, if they are people who readily pre-empt over 2Club-small with not much and raise light then I am likely to double."(for penalties?)

 " I believe that we will take 3Spade-small enough light if I double and my partner passes for it to be worth it. However, I will bid 4Spade-small, which should indicate that I have a slammish+ hand with two suits, potentially both minors but when partner bids 5Club-small, I will bid 6Club-small and if partner bids 5Diamond-small I will bid 6Club-small also, which should indicate that my two suits are hearts and clubs.”

All fine but perhaps 4NT would show both minors?

Back though where we started:

Andy Braithwaite “ Double: Cannot see any other bid than double which is take-out when opponents bid and support.”

Well, the auction is not over and all is  not lost even if partner bids 4Diamond-small. However, the concept of 4Spade-small showing hearts and a minor appeals.

Although, North might find it rather strange to be declarer in 6Heart-small, that would seem to be where the auction would have headed:

North Deals
None Vul

10 7 5

J 10 5 4

10 9 8 4

9 2

A K J 4 3 2

9 7

Q 7 6

Q 3

 

N

W

 

E

S

 

Q 9 8 6

3 2

J 3 2

10 8 6 5

 

A K Q 8 6

A K 5

A K J 7 4

 

West

North

East

South

 

Pass

Pass

2 ♣

2 ♠

Pass

3 ♠

4 ♠

Pass

5 

Pass

5 ♠

Pass

6 

All pass

 

Having the weak hand as declarer should be no drawback this time. 5Spade-small looked to see if North had anything to offer on the way to 6Heart-small. I cannot believe they would show the doubleton club though with a fair trump suit, just perhaps the doubleton would be what South was looking for. Of course, were either opponent to hold Club-small Qxxx, or there to be a less friendly trump break, then grand slam may prove impossible

Reaching 6Heart-small should be normal and it does not matter who is declarer. Were South to double, and North to reluctantly bid 4Heart-small, South could drive on to slam, a little luckily. 4Spade-small after 3Spade-small seems to better indicate what South really does hold.

Richard Solomon

 

 

Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • TECT.jpg